Seismic Shear Wave Studies


 

 

Inthe Earth, vibrations travel as compressional (primary or P) waves, or as shear (secondary or S) waves Sound is an example of a P-wave, with the motion of particles parallel to the direction of wave propagation..The Difference Between P and S Wave Particle Motions   For S-waves, particle motion is perpendicular to propagation – like a loop of slack flicked down a rope. P-waves are called primary because, in any material, they travel faster than S-waves.  For any material, the seismic velocities Vp and Vs are physical properties that depend upon the density and elastic properties of that material. In terms of common engineering properties, Vp is related to rippability or ease of excavation, while Vs is related to bearing capacity or stiffness (and SPT blow counts or N-value).  The Vs of materials beneath a site dominates the Earth’s local response to dynamic loading (e.g. from a wind tower or turbine) or earthquake vibrations.

Casino Constructed in a Seismic Hazard ZoneThe International Building Code (IBC) specifies the weighted average Vs in the top 30 meters or 100 feet (called V30 or V100) as one criterion for determining Site Class. On a construction project, a lax site classification can entail serious safety and liability concerns, while an overly conservative site classification can have significant cost consequences. Therefore, accurate pre-design site classification is critical.New Windfarm Construction Site

Another key difference between P- and S-waves is that S-waves cannot travel in a fluid. That is, any propagation of vibration or seismic waves through a fluid (air, water, etc.) occurs only as P-waves. Therefore, water content affects Vp, but Vs is immune to saturation effects, making S-wave surveys particularly sensitive to highly porous materials or cavities. The ability to see differences in soil stiffness, even at saturation makes, S-wave studies useful for evaluating earthen dams and levees, and for determining liquefaction potential.

There are many geophysical methods for determining 1–dimensional Vs vs. depth (and thus V100 ).  Some are necessarily invasive (requiring instruments in one or more boreholes). Others are non-invasive – involving only surface equipment and measurements.  The non-invasive surface methods can be further subdivided into active (i.e. requiring a specific seismic source) or passive (i.e. employing whatever ambient vibrations may be present from traffic, industry, ocean waves, trees swaying in the wind, etc.). The available methods are listed and illustrated on the accompanying page.2-D Shear Wave Velocity Cross-Section over a Confirmed Cave

Invasive methods usually require boreholes that are cased and grouted to provide good coupling between seismic sources and receivers and the formation, and thus tend to require more effort/cost. Non-invasive methods are easier to deploy than borehole methods, but generally cannot provide the thin-bed detection of invasive methods. However, the borehole methods sample only a very small area – which can be misleading on a large site with lateral variations in Vs.  Luckily, numerous studies have shown generally good agreement between the various methods.

Comparison of 1-D Shear Wave Velocity Profiles from Different Methods at a Borehole on a Power Plant Construction Site

Choice of a seismic shear wave method depends on specific site conditions and requirements.  The following table summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of each, with sketches depicting the physics and procedure.

 

 

Advantages

Disadvantages

Surface Methods

sample large areas

poor thin bed detection

 

Refraction

simple field equipment and procedures

blind to low velocity zones, low signal to noise ratio

 

Reflection

good detection of low velocity zones

ineffective at very shallow depths (<50 to 100 feet), low signal to noise ratio

 

Surface Wave Spectral Analysis

simple field equipment and procedures, active source methods good at shallow depths, passive methods good for larger depths, good signal to noise ratio

relatively low resolution

Borehole Methods

good thin bed detection, accurate velocities

require specially-constructed boreholes, sample only the immediate vicinity of the borehole

 

ASTM Crosshole
(D4428/D4428M-84)

most accurate velocities

requires three specially-constructed holes

 

Sonic Logging

best thin bed detection

signal frequency is higher than those that affect engineering behaviour, requires specialized logging rig

 

Suspension Logging

signal frequency consistent with engineering behavior

requires specialized logging rig

 

Vertical Seismic Profiling

simple field equipment and procedure

 

 

Sonic Cone Penetrometer

 

requires specialized direct push rig

Seismic Refraction Method Schematic

Suspension or Sonic Logging Method Schematic

Seismic Reflection Method Schematic

Vertical Seismic Profiling (VSP) or Sonic Cone Penetrometer (SCPT) Method Schematic

Seismic Surface Wave Method Schematic

ASTM Crosshole Method Schematic

See Also:

  • [Home] [About Us] [Our Clients] [Our Services] [Marine Surveys] [Well Logging] [Contact Us] [Careers] [Site Search] [Just for Fun] [World Peace]